Skip to main content

Physical Security: the People and Process | Week 4

Sometimes it's easy to dive deep into an IT department and get carried away with security regarding servers, ACLs, firewalls, antivirus programs, monitoring software, and all that technical jazz. There is another aspect to information security however that gets easily overlooked, and that is the physical security monitoring the people who make up an organization. From employees to vendors, from contractors to outside sales reps, any organization with physical office space or even physical server space needs to have detailed insights into who is accessing what, and when.  

Technology and automated controls still play a big part in the physical security of people and data, and many organizations have combined the two aspects into one department. It’s been my experience however that the two aspects of information security have stayed relatively separate in the organizations I have worked for.  

One project I worked on a couple years ago was to build out a security operations center (SOC). The SOC is a command center that monitors access, cameras across multiple geographies, update physical badge access, track vendors and guests who are on the property, and monitor logs of all door access. At its heart is people. It is fully staffed 24/7 with designated people to monitor real-time cameras and access. Other people monitor and report on log access while others are out on the grounds driving around the campus, directing traffic, ensuring vendors are parking where they should. Emergency response plans are mapped out, training for general employees and security personnel is required on an annual basis, and automated controls are used where available to streamline operations. 

The most critical aspect of the SOC is process. Every process and procedure is documented and communicated out. Everything is logged and auditable. Emergency response plans are mapped out, training for general employees and security personnel is required on an annual basis, and automated controls are used where available to streamline operations.  


  

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A Balancing Act: When Security Controls Disrupt Operations | Week 10

In an ideal world security controls should integrate seamlessly with business strategy and through policy and procedure support operations.  In reality however  security controls often disrupt operations. From a user perspective an Information Security Department is simply a group of people sitting behind computers all day saying “no” to everyone. Although that is sometimes the case (“no” is a common word in their vocabulary from what I have seen), there are reasons behind it.   This week I want to share a story of how a change in policy and procedure by one security department, disrupted current operational workflow in another. Our AV engineering team works with integration vendors to build out the videoconferencing infrastructure through our offices. One day our director of security decided this  vendor  had too many badges assigned to them and wanted to reel back access to physical locations by limiting the badges to 2.    The reasonin...

A Test of Physical Security - A Real World Example | Week 5

I would like to build off last week’s post by sharing a real-world example of how no matter how many security controls you have in place, employee engagement and adherence to policy will inevitably determine their effectiveness.   The organization I work for have two separate departments, one for data security (think workstations, servers, etc.) and the other for physical security (think door/badge access, security cameras, etc.). Both departments are completely separated from each other and operate in their own silos. One day the security operations center who manages the physical security of our buildings decided to run a penetration test. They hired an outside contractor, gave him a “lost employee bade” with basic access, and told him to see what he can gain access to in a day before getting caught.    So  off this contractor went wearing a badge without his picture on it, no knowledge of the key combination to use with the badge, but simply followin...

Bitlocker, Filevault, JAMF, and KACE – Auditable Encryption Verification | Week 9

As you can clearly tell from my previous posts, I am a big fan of automated controls. This week I want to share with you a story of a recent computer upgrade. I had an old 2013  Macbook  Air. Our Desktop Engineering team was tasked with rolling out the new OS, Mojave, to all outdated Mac systems. Now my Air was a test Mac I got years ago and never really had much need to upgrade. Through automated controls, specifically a tool called Casper JAMF, our Desktop  Eng  team was able to tell that my Mac was outdated and needed an upgrade.   They reached out to me, set up a time to update, and realized that the hardware was simply too old for the new OS. To accommodate they initiated an update procedure. A new  MacbookPro  was imaged, updated, and given to me. They jumped the gun when they distributed it to me in production however and the disk encryption,  FileVault , was not completed before it left the secured image lab. Once again, the JAMF s...